Improving the Environment
Toward A Higher
Quality Environment*
A preliminary
step in solving a problem is understanding its causes. The signs seem obvious.
The average temperatures of the air, the oceans, and the surface of the oceans
are rising at an accelerated rate. The oceans have been getting more acidic due
to increased absorption of carbon dioxide, according to EPA’s “Climate Change
Indicators in the United States.”1 Man-made chemical pesticides are
killing large numbers of bees, butterflies, other insects, and small aquatic
life forms on which fish feed.2 These are some of many examples of
how the quality of the Earth’s environment is deteriorating due to human
activity.
Without a
quality environment there can be no environmental justice. But what is more
important: social justice or environmental justice? Social justice involves
protecting and promoting the quality of all human lives. The quality of human
life depends to some degree on our ability to access the common good. A quality environment is one aspect of the
common good. So environmental justice is es
A quality
environment is essential to our opportunities to pursue happiness and to be
healthy. This Earth celebration of 2017 is an appropriate time to pose the
question, “Why aren’t the citizens of Earth, and of the United States in
particular, not more committed to preserving as much environmental quality as
possible?” The short answer is that people in general would prefer
environmental quality but that other factors Including ignorance, denial,
religious beliefs, materialism, and the desire to make life easier get in the
way. For a more complete explanation, continue reading.
1. Ignorance
Ignorance, or lack of awareness, plays a role in the
human behavior that negatively affects our environment and our health. There
are many ways in which people harm the environment without being aware that
they are doing so. A few examples are (a) Releasing helium balloons into the
outside air space. Some of these balloons, once they return to earth and become
litter, kill animals that mistake them for food.3 (b) Some of us
threaten the survival of endangered species without realizing it by purchasing
products made from those species. (c) Lots of people purchase products made
from crops or animals, such as palm trees, soybeans and cattle, grown on land
that once supported a rainforest habitat.4
2. Denial
Humans are adding a virtual witch’s brew of humanly
invented synthetic chemicals to the air, water, and land; genetically modifying
plants and animals; and releasing into the air and water vast quantities of
elements including mercury, arsenic, sulfur, and carbon that have been locked
up in the earth for longer than we humans have been walking on the planet.
There are apparently intelligent humans who understand the law of cause and
effect who choose to deny the possibility that adding the chemicals and
elements mentioned above to the ecosphere could negatively affect environmental
quality or public health.
3. Religious Beliefs
The so-called primitive or hedonistic cultures that
regarded different aspects of nature like the sun or a volcano as sacred were
not hell-bent on taming and subjugating nature. What was the difference between
those cultures and the culture responsible for the Industrial Revolution and its
accompanying worldwide environmental consequences?
One difference between primitive cultures that lived more
in harmony with their environment and the culture that made global warming a
reality was that the latter had Genesis 1:26, or their interpretation thereof,
to justify their treatment or mistreatment of the earth. In that Bible verse,
that is part of the first story of the Creation in the book of Genesis, God
says to let man have dominion (power) “over all the earth.” There is no mention
of the fall from grace in the first Creation story. It would seem that God made
that statement about dominion before Eve was seduced by the serpent into eating
the forbidden fruit.
In the second
Creation story, after man’s fall from grace, God tells Adam “cursed is the
ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;
thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee” (Genesis 3:17–18). I
believe that whatever power over the earth that God seemed to give man in
Genesis 1:26 was taken away from humans as punishment for Adam’s disobedience
(“original sin” in Catholic parlance). This Biblical interpretation does not
appeal to the people who believe that earth belongs to humans and that it is
ours to do with as we please.
4. Materialism
Materialism is a value system in which material
things are of the utmost importance as is the means for attaining material
possessions and power—that is, money. Materialism is a value system that
justifies greed, selfishness, and doing whatever is necessary to make more
money/attain more power. Trashing earth to make a profit is acceptable behavior from a materialistic
perspective.
Some corporate
environmental polluters deliberately violate environmental regulations to
increase profits, particularly when the potential gain is greater than the fine
that would be levied if they are caught. More unnecessary poisoning of the
environment results in a greater incidence of human disease. Corporate
environmental bullies rationalize that more environmental regulations will cost
more, thus preventing them from expanding their businesses and hiring more
people. More workers may produce more unnecessary pollution. More pollution
will result in more human sickness and higher health care costs.
For people who
believe in materialism, profit is more important than both environmental
quality and human health. Unfortunately, the value system of Materialism seems
to be exercising as much influence in Washington at the present time as it did
during the robber baron period.
5. A Desire to Make Life Easier
There seems to be a human drive, at least in Western
culture, to make daily life easier. Some people seem to have a need to make
surviving easier, to make earning money easier, and even to make pleasure
seeking easier. Modern life is easier thanks to the internal combustion engine,
the electric grid, paved roads, and cell phones.
But what, in
terms of human suffering and death, is the cost of preserving the maximized
ease of living for those who can afford it? Conflict minerals must continue to
be mined with slave labor to make cell phones and other electronic devices.5
Forests, crops, and public monuments must continue to suffer damage from the
effects of acid precipitation.6 Thousands more with black lung
disease, asthma, and other respiratory diseases must continue to suffer and die
prematurely.7 Future generations must be deprived of the species
diversity that would otherwise exist. More people’s private property must be
damaged by earthquakes induced by fracking.8 These negative
consequences and more are the cost of making human life easier.
How can YOU
help the earth? Short answer: (1) Educate yourself and others (2)
Challenge the deniers (3) Confront religious earth abusers (4) Hold the
Materialists accountable9 (5) Make eco-friendly, socially-conscious
expenditures9 (6) Choose a renewable energy supplier.10
1 US EPA, “Climate Change Indicators in the United
States,” November 10, 2015, http://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/science/indicators/oceans/index.html.
2 Louis A. Helfrich, et al., “Pesticides and Aquatic
Animals: A Guide to Reducing Impacts on Aquatic Systems,” Virginia Cooperative
Extension, May 1, 2009, accessed May 15, 2016, https://pubs.ext.vt.edu/420/420-013/420-013.html.
3 Balloons Blow …
Don’t Let Them Go, “Impacts
on Wildlife & the Environment,” accessed May 15, 2016, http://balloonsblow.org/impacts-on-wildlife-and-environment/.
4 Ashley
Schaeffer, “Species Gravely Endangered
by Global Trade of Commodities like Palm Oil,” 2012, accessed May
15, 2016, http://www.care2.com/causes/species-gravely-endangered-by-global-trade-of-commodities-like-palm-oil.html.
5 Tom
Clynes, “Is there Such a Thing as Conflict-free-minerals?” Take Part, September 4, 2015,
accessed January 5, 2016, http://www.takepart.com/feature/2015/09/04/conflict-free-minerals?cmpid=tpdaily-eml-2015-09-04.
6
Amanda Briney, “Acid Rain—The Causes, History, and Effects of
Acid Rain,” About.com, accessed January 5, 2016, http://geography.about.com/od/globalproblemsandissues/a/acidrain.htm.
7 “How Air
Pollution Contributes to Lung Disease,” Physicians for Social Responsibility,
accessed January 5, 2016, http://www.psr.org/assets/pdfs/air-pollution-effects-respiratory.pdf.
8 Molly Redden, “A Scary New Study Erases Doubts That
Fracking Causes Earthquakes,” New Republic, September 6, 2013, accessed
January 5, 2016, https://newrepublic.com/article/114620/fracking-and-earthquakes-new-study-provides-scary-evidence.
10 “Deregulation by States,” Quantum
Gas & Power Services, accessed January 4, 2016, http://www.quantumgas.com/energy_deregulation_map_of_united_states.html.
*Based on an excerpt
from Chapter 15 of Inalienable Rights versus Abuse by R. Q. Public.
Comments
Post a Comment